Solutions / Prior authorization

Prior authorization software for status and follow-up

Automate requirement checks, payer-specific submissions, updates, status, and follow-up while your team keeps clinical judgment.

VoiceAdminHealthcare operations infrastructure
Built for

Authorization and patient-access teams coordinating administrative requirements across payers, documents, portals, and calls.

Operational outcome

A case record with requirement status, submitted evidence, payer response, reference details, and the next follow-up action.

What this means in practice

Prior authorization built around completed work.

Prior authorization software coordinates requirement checks, supporting records, submission paths, payer status, deadlines, and follow-up. Automation should keep the case current across portals, calls, fax or documents, and system updates without making the payer decision itself.

Work this solution can cover
  • Authorization requirement checks
  • Payer-specific questionnaires, documents, submissions, and updates
  • Receipt, case number, status, and missing-item tracking
  • Payer decision status, result capture, and administrative follow-up
How deployment starts

Choose one service line and payer set. Map requirement checks, documentation, submission, status intervals, expiration, denial handoff, and write-back before expanding to additional authorization types.

What to evaluate

Can the workflow handle payer-specific requirements?

Confirm how it stores the plan, service, provider, form, evidence, and channel rules needed for each authorization path.

Does it track the case after submission?

The result should include receipt, case or reference number, current status, missing items, next date, and owner.

Where does clinical judgment stay?

Clinical documentation and medical-necessity decisions must remain with the authorized provider and payer teams.

Configured around your workflow

Common workflows and use cases clients automate

Your dedicated project manager learns your workflow, then works with a forward-deployed engineer to customize the agents around your questions, channels, and handoffs.

Workflow example 01

Check whether prior authorization is required

Use the payer-specific permitted path and preserve the requirement source.

Example inputAuthorization requirement check
  • Patient and provider
  • Payer and plan
  • Service and CPT
  • Planned date of service
  1. 01 / decision

    Is authorization required?

    Yes

    Open the payer-specific authorization path

    No

    Return the source, reference, and no-authorization-required state

  2. 02 / decision

    Does the requirement apply to this service, provider, and location?

    Yes

    Capture the payer rule and effective window

    No

    Return the payer-provided exception and source

  3. 03 / decision

    Is a referral or another prerequisite also required?

    Yes

    Return the prerequisite and responsible path

    No

    Complete the requirement check

Structured resultWhat your team gets back
  • Requirement state
  • Payer rule and source
  • Effective dates
  • Prerequisites
  • Next owner
Workflow example 02

Submit or update the authorization request

Clinical judgment stays with your authorized team.

Example inputAuthorization submission or update
  • Patient, provider, payer, and service
  • Payer-specific questionnaire and supporting documents
  • Configured submission path
  1. 01 / decision

    Are the payer-specific questionnaire and supporting documents complete?

    Yes

    Prepare the approved administrative submission

    No

    Route the named missing items to the responsible team

  2. 02 / decision

    Is the permitted payer-specific channel available?

    Yes

    Submit through the configured electronic, portal, phone, fax, or document path

    No

    Stop and route the channel exception with case context

  3. 03 / decision

    Did the service or supporting record change?

    Yes

    Update the request through the approved payer path

    No

    Preserve the submitted version and receipt evidence

Structured resultWhat your team gets back
  • Submitted questionnaire and documents
  • Submission or update state
  • Receipt evidence
  • Missing items
  • Next owner
Workflow example 03

Track receipt, status, and payer decision

Keep the current payer state visible without treating an administrative workflow as a clinical or payer decision.

Example inputAuthorization status and decision follow-up
  • Submitted authorization request
  • Payer receipt evidence
  • Case reference
  • Follow-up policy
  1. 01 / decision

    Was the request received?

    Yes

    Capture received date, case number, and current status

    No

    Confirm the permitted submission destination and escalation path

  2. 02 / decision

    Is anything missing from payer review?

    Yes

    Return the exact missing item, destination, deadline, and owner

    No

    Continue status follow-up on the configured interval

  3. 03 / decision

    Has the payer returned a decision?

    Yes

    Capture the decision, authorization number, dates, and payer response

    No

    Set the next follow-up date and keep the case current

  4. 04 / decision

    Is peer-to-peer or pre-service appeal available?

    Yes

    Route the option, instructions, and deadline to the authorized team

    No

    Return the payer decision and approved next administrative path

Structured resultWhat your team gets back
  • Receipt, case number, and current status
  • Missing documents
  • Payer decision and dates
  • Peer-to-peer or pre-service appeal option, when available
  • Next owner

A defined workflow contract.

The configured workflow can coordinate portal, phone, fax or document, electronic, and human steps according to payer requirements.

Inputs configured with your team
  • Patient, provider, payer, and service
  • Available supporting documents
  • Workflow status and deadlines
  • Required fields and escalation owners
Structured results
  • Requirement and case status
  • Questionnaire, submitted, or missing documents
  • Payer reference and response
  • Next action, date, and owner
Reviewable by design

The result includes the context behind it.

01State current

Each case shows its latest requirement and response status.

02Documents linked

Supporting records stay connected to the case and action taken.

03Owner clear

Outstanding work has a next date and responsible path.

What this page covers

Scope is explicit before work goes live.

VoiceAdmin supports administrative workflow execution. Clinical judgment stays with authorized people, and the payer makes the authorization decision.

Frequently asked questions

Does VoiceAdmin approve prior authorizations?

No. VoiceAdmin coordinates configured administrative steps. The payer makes authorization decisions, and clinical judgment stays with authorized clinicians.

Can the workflow track supporting documents?

Yes. The configured case can track received, submitted, missing, and requested documents together with payer references and status.

What happens when a payer asks for clinical review?

The case routes to the appropriate authorized team member with the request, case context, supporting evidence, and deadline.

Document automationMatch and route supporting authorization records.Portal agentsComplete configured portal status and requirement tasks.

Bring one real workflow. We will map the inputs, channel path, result, and exceptions with your team.

Book a demo