Solutions / Claims

Claim scrubbing, electronic claim submission, and status automation

Apply configured claim-scrubbing rules, support electronic claim submission through deployment-approved connectivity, and automate claim status follow-up with a clear next action.

VoiceAdminHealthcare operations infrastructure
Built for

Medical billing and revenue cycle teams applying claim-scrubbing rules, supporting electronic submission, and resolving claim status, rejection, denial, and payment questions.

Operational outcome

A claim with validation and submission state, payer acknowledgement or status, supporting reason, reference information, and a specific next action.

What this means in practice

Claims built around completed work.

Claim scrubbing, electronic claim submission, and claim status automation can share one configured workflow. Exact claim types, edits, payer connectivity, acknowledgments, status sources, and write-back are confirmed for each deployment.

Work this solution can cover
  • Claim validation and scrubbing rules
  • 837 submission with 999 and 277CA acknowledgments
  • 276/277 claim status and 835/ERA remittance
  • Permitted portal or payer representative follow-up when electronic sources do not resolve the question
How deployment starts

Start with one claim population and a small set of failure paths. Validate clean claims, rejections, pending claims, denials, and missing payer detail against the team definition of done.

What to evaluate

Which claim-processing steps are in scope?

Confirm data validation, edits, submission, acknowledgements, status, denials, payment, posting, and follow-up separately.

Can it explain why a claim stopped?

Require rejection or denial detail, source evidence, reference information, and the correction or follow-up path.

Does it write back to the billing workflow?

Map the exact fields, queue, status, note, task, owner, and retry behavior before production.

Configured around your workflow

Common workflows and use cases clients automate

Your dedicated project manager learns your workflow, then works with a forward-deployed engineer to customize the agents around your questions, channels, and handoffs.

Workflow example 01

Confirm claim acknowledgment

Keep the 999 implementation acknowledgment and 277CA claim-level acceptance separate.

Example inputClaim acknowledgment
  • 837 claim submission
  • Payer and submitter IDs
  • Claim control number
  • Submission timestamp
  1. 01 / decision

    Did the 999 accept the submitted 837 transaction set?

    Yes

    Continue to claim-level acknowledgment

    No

    Return the implementation rejection detail and submission owner

  2. 02 / decision

    Did the 277CA accept the claim?

    Yes

    Record the accepted claim acknowledgment

    No

    Structure the claim rejection and correction detail

  3. 03 / decision

    Does the rejection require team review?

    Yes

    Route the rejection evidence and affected fields

    No

    Apply the configured correction or resubmission path

Structured resultWhat your team gets back
  • 999 implementation acknowledgment
  • 277CA claim acknowledgment
  • Acceptance or rejection detail
  • Claim control reference
  • Next action
Workflow example 02

Resolve current claim status

Start with supported electronic status. Use a permitted portal or payer representative only when electronic sources do not resolve the question.

Example inputClaim status follow-up
  • Claim and payer ID
  • Patient and provider
  • Date and billed amount
  • 276 status request
  1. 01 / decision

    Did the 277 response return the current claim status?

    Yes

    Capture paid, pending, rejected, denied, or other payer-provided status

    No

    Check the other supported electronic evidence for this claim

  2. 02 / decision

    Do the electronic sources resolve the status question?

    Yes

    Return the status, source, and timestamp

    No

    Continue through a permitted portal or payer representative workflow

  3. 03 / decision

    Is another action required?

    Yes

    Capture the payer-provided reason, destination, owner, and follow-up date

    No

    Return the resolved claim state

Structured resultWhat your team gets back
  • 276/277 claim status
  • Payer-provided reason
  • Source and reference
  • Specific next action
Workflow example 03

Research remittance, adjustment, and denial detail

An unavailable 835 does not automatically mean a payer call. Check supported claim and remittance evidence before changing channels.

Example inputClaim remittance research
  • Claim and remittance identifiers
  • 835/ERA file, when available
  • Supported claim and remittance records
  • Question to resolve
  1. 01 / decision

    Is an 835/ERA available for the claim or payment?

    Yes

    Structure the payment, adjustment, or denial detail as the starting evidence

    No

    Check supported claim and remittance records before choosing another channel

  2. 02 / decision

    Do the electronic sources resolve the payment, adjustment, or denial question?

    Yes

    Return the payment, adjustment, or denial detail and electronic source

    No

    Continue through a permitted portal or payer representative workflow

  3. 03 / decision

    Does the result require follow-up?

    Yes

    Write back the reason, evidence, next queue, owner, and date

    No

    Return the resolved remittance state

Structured resultWhat your team gets back
  • 835/ERA remittance
  • Payment, adjustment, or denial detail
  • Source evidence
  • Next queue and owner

A defined workflow contract.

Claims work keeps 999 and 277CA acknowledgments, 276/277 claim status, and 835/ERA remittance distinct. A permitted portal or payer representative workflow is used only when supported electronic sources do not resolve the question.

Inputs configured with your team
  • Patient, payer, provider, and claim identifiers
  • Service, coding, charge, and attachment context
  • Validation, scrubbing, and submission rules
  • Required status, evidence, and output fields
Structured results
  • Validation and submission state
  • Acknowledgement or current claim status
  • Payer-stated reason and source detail
  • Correction, next action, and follow-up date
Reviewable by design

The result includes the context behind it.

01Status sourced

The result identifies the evidence or payer channel used.

02Reason captured

Payer detail is structured for action, not left only in a transcript.

03Follow-up assigned

The workflow returns a next action, date, or explicit review state.

What this page covers

Scope is explicit before work goes live.

Claim scrubbing rules, electronic submission connectivity, claim types, acknowledgments, status sources, and write-back are confirmed for each deployment. Coding, posting, and denial decisions remain with the responsible teams.

Frequently asked questions

Does VoiceAdmin submit or scrub claims?

VoiceAdmin can apply configured claim-validation and scrubbing rules and support agreed electronic submission workflows. Exact claim types, edits, coding ownership, connectivity, acknowledgements, and system write-back are confirmed for the engagement.

Can the workflow use claim status EDI?

Yes. Electronic claim-status information can be one source, with portal or phone follow-up used when more detail is needed.

What happens when the payer requests another action?

The result can record the requested item, deadline, source, reference information, and owner for the next configured step.

Healthcare EDIUse claim-status transactions inside a wider workflow.Portal agentsCollect payer detail and source context.

Bring one real workflow. We will map the inputs, channel path, result, and exceptions with your team.

Book a demo